v6 mustang breaks the 9's

[ZimStang]

A guy on another board Im on just broke 9's with his turbo v6. hes the first to do that... pretty cool if you ask me :2up:

550hp 503tq
mods: 4.2 stroker with custom turbo
60ft-1.44
1/8th mile-6.32@112mph
1/4 mile-9.85@128.65mph

[93svt]

pretty cool, but a waste of money to build a sixer mustang. no offense to the guys with sixers. he obviously has money to buy a gt.

[PitchBlackStang]

pretty cool, but a waste of money to build a sixer mustang. no offense to the guys with sixers. he obviously has money to buy a gt.

Bobby you obviously dont get it... What a waste to buy a mustang when you could buy a FordGT.

Its about building it to be fast and being the first to do so. And BTW he 'll whoop your A$$ at the track, lol:Jimmy_kicking_time_

[93svt]

when i said gt i meant gt mustang. got to love the sound of a v8 with exhaust.

Oh yeah i never argued him beating me, hell im not stupid. plus i know my car is slow. LOL

[PitchBlackStang]

when i said gt i meant gt mustang. got to love the sound of a v8 with exhaust.

Oh yeah i never argued him beating me, hell im not stupid. plus i know my car is slow. LOL

Thats the way I like em Slow and pretty, LOL
Dont tell my wife I said that, d'oh

[ZimStang]

Its not a waste to mod a sixxer... its just harder. Grand nationals were sixxers... I dont see anyone hating on those ;)

[3.8xpress]

Its not a waste to mod a sixxer... its just harder. Grand nationals were sixxers... I dont see anyone hating on those ;)
Man, that's the truth, one of the most feared v6's in drag racing!

[3.8xpress]

I am modding my six because it can put up some good numbers with "relatively" not that much money. There are some stupid quick v6 mustangs out there, and in my opinion some that don't sound all THAT bad.

Oh and Bobby (thats my dad's name) I have the money to buy a mustang GT, but to me that is a waste of money...why buy a 2v when you can buy a 4v for not much more money?

[ZimStang]

I want a mach 1 :)

[Silverfox]

4.3v6 have just as much go power as the 302...just no rumble, so don't count it out of the "fast" department just cause it has a V6....4.2 is only 0.4 liters smaller than 4.6. SO don't brag about the 4.6 being king cause it wheighs about the same - maybe more than a 5.8L and has less power.

Not that I am a 4.2 guy...never even seen one accualy.

But in terms of the MUSTANG....v6 means "poor mans muscle car want-to-be" No classic muscle car with exception of TC and SC and the Buick and maybe GTC will ever be considered muscular...IMHO.

[93svt]

Oh and Bobby (thats my dad's name) I have the money to buy a mustang GT, but to me that is a waste of money...why buy a 2v when you can buy a 4v for not much more money?

Thats why i opted for the cobra. i spent the extra money. plus it was just my opinion. not meant to get everyone in a frenzy. Sorry Everyone take a deep breathe. *Rub you ears and say WoooSaaaw

LMFAO

[ZimStang]

4.3v6 have just as much go power as the 302...just no rumble, so don't count it out of the "fast" department just cause it has a V6....4.2 is only 0.4 liters smaller than 4.6. SO don't brag about the 4.6 being king cause it wheighs about the same - maybe more than a 5.8L and has less power.

Not that I am a 4.2 guy...never even seen one accualy.

But in terms of the MUSTANG....v6 means "poor mans muscle car want-to-be" No classic muscle car with exception of TC and SC and the Buick and maybe GTC will ever be considered muscular...IMHO.

I dont consider it a "muscle car" either, I just think it's cool that the v6 community is starting to have lower and lower ET's. Having owned a v6 for a while and hearing all of the "why waste your money" comments, stuff like this just interests me. Theres another guy on the board that ran a low 11 sec ET with just a TT setup on the stock motor (with fuel upgrades). Pretty cool I think :shrug: